Skip to content

95 Theses

Introduction Amore et studio elucidande veritas hec subscripta disputabuntur Wittenberge, Presidente R.P. Martino Lutter, Artium et S. Theologie Magistro eiusdemque ibidem lectore Ordinario. Quare petit, ut qui non possunt verbis presentes nobiscum disceptare agant id literis absentes. In nomine domini nostri Hiesu Christi. Amen. Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and Lecturer in Ordinary on the same at that place. Wherefore he requests that those who are unable to be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter. In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen. Commentary
1 Dominus et magister noster Iesus Christus dicendo ,Penitentiam agite etc.’ omnem vitam fidelium penitentiam esse voluit. 1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said Poenitentiam agite, willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance. Commentary
2 Quod verbum de penitentia sacramentali (id est confessionis et stisfactionis, que sacerdotum ministerio celebratur) non potest intelligi. 2. This word cannot be understood to mean sacramental penance, i.e., confession and satisfaction, which is administered by the priests. Commentary
3 Non tamen solam intendit interiorem, immo interior nulla est, nisi foris operetur varias carnis mortificationes. 3. Yet it means not inward repentance only; nay, there is no inward repentance which does not outwardly work divers mortifications of the flesh. Commentary
4 Manet itaque pena, donec manet odium sui (id est penitentia vera intus), scilicet usque ad introitum regni celorum. 4. The penalty [of sin], therefore, continues so long as hatred of self continues; for this is the true inward repentance, and continues until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven. Commentary
5 Papa non vult nec potest ullas penas remittere preter eas, quas arbitrio vel suo vel canonum imposuit. 5. The pope does not intend to remit, and cannot remit any penalties other than those which he has imposed either by his own authority or by that of the Canons. Commentary
6 Papa non potest remittere ullam culpam nisi declarando et approbando remissam a deo Aut certe remittendo casus reservatos sibi, quibus contemptis culpa prorsus remaneret. 6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring that it has been remitted by God and by assenting to God’s remission; though, to be sure, he may grant remission in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant remission in such cases were despised, the guilt would remain entirely unforgiven. Commentary
7 Nulli prorsus remittit deus culpam, quin simul eum subiiciat humiliatum in omnibus sácerdoti suo vicario. 7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His vicar, the priest. Commentary
8 Canones penitentiales solum viventibus sunt impositi, nihilque morituris eosdem debet imponi. 8. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and, according to them, nothing should be imposed on the dying. Commentary
9 Inde bene nobis facit spiritussanctus in papa excipiendo in suis decretis semper articulum motris et necessitatis. 9. Therefore the Holy Spirit in the pope is kind to us, because in his decrees he always makes exception of the article of death and of necessity. Commentary
10 Indocte et male faciunt sacerdotes ii, qui morituris penitentias canonicias in purgatorium reservant. 10. Ignorant and wicked are the doings of those priests who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penances for purgatory. Commentary
11 Zizania illa de mutanda pena Canonica in penam purgatorii videntur certe dormientibus episcopis seminata. 11. This changing of the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory is quite evidently one of the tares that were sown while the bishops slept. Commentary
12 Olim pene canonice non post, sed ante absolutionem imponebantur tanquam tentamenta vere contritionis. 12. In former times the canonical penalties were imposed not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition. Commentary
13 Morituri per mortem omnia solvunt et legibus canonum morituri iam sunt, habentes irue earum relaxationem. 13. The dying are freed by death from all penalties; they are already dead to canonical rules, and have a right to be released from them. Commentary
14 Imperfecta sanitas seu charitas morituri necessario secum fert magnum timorem, tantoque maiorem, quanto minor ferit ipsa. 14. The imperfect health [of soul], that is to say, the imperfect love, of the dying brings with it, of necessity, great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater is the fear. Commentary
15 Hic timor et horror satis est se solo (ut alia taceam) facere penem purgatorii, cum sit proximus desperationis horrori. 15. This fear and horror is sufficient of itself alone (to say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair. Commentary
16 Videntur infernus, purgatorium, celum differre, sicut desperatio probe deperatio, decuritas differunt. 16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ as do despair, almost-despair, and the assurance of safety. Commentary
17 Necassarium videtur animabus in purgatorio sciut minui horrorem, ita ugeri charitatem. 17. With souls in purgatory it seems necessary that horror should grow less and love increase. Commentary
18 Nec probatum vidertur ullis aut rationibus aut scripturis, quod sint statum meriti seu augende charitatis. 18. It seems unproved, either by reason or Scripture, that they are outside the state of merit, that is to say, of increasing love. Commentary
19 Nec hoc probatum esse videtur, quod sint de sua betitudine certe et secure, saltem, licet nos certissimi simus. 19. Again, it seems unproved that they, or at least that all of them, are certain or assured of their own blessedness, though we may be quite certain of it. Commentary
20 Igitur papa per remissionem plenariam omnium penarum non simpliciter omnium intelligit, sed a seipso tantummodo imposarium. 20. Therefore by “full remission of all penalties” the pope means not actually “of all,” but only of those imposed by himself. Commentary
21 Errant itaque indulgentiarum predicatres ii, qui dicunt per pape indulgentias hominem ab omni pena solvi et salvari. 21. Therefore those preachers of indulgences are in error, who say that by the pope’s indulgences a man is freed from every penalty, and saved; Commentary
22 Quin nullam remittit animabus in purgatorio, quam in hac vita debuissent secundum Canones solvere. 22. Whereas he remits to souls in purgatory no penalty which, according to the canons, they would have had to pay in this life. Commentary
23 Si remissio ulla omnium omnino perarum potest alicui dari, certum est eam non nisi perfectissimis, i.e. paucissimis. 23. If it is at all possible to grant to any one the remission of all penalties whatsoever, it is certain that this remission can be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to the very fewest. Commentary
24 Falli ob id necesse est maiorem partem populi per indifferentem illam et magnificam pene solute promissionem. 24. It must needs be, therefore, that the greater part of the people are deceived by that indiscriminate and highsounding promise of release from penalty. Commentary
25 Qualem potestatem habet papa in purgatorium generaliter, talem habet quilibet Episcorpus et Curatus in sua diocesi et parachia specialiter. 25. The power which the pope has, in a general way, over purgatory, is just like the power which any bishop or curate has, in a special way, within his own diocese or parish. Commentary
26 Optime facit papa, quod non potestate clavis (quam nullam habet) sed per modum suffragii dat animabus remissionem. 26. The pope does well when he grants remission to souls [in purgatory], not by the power of the keys (which he does not possess), but by way of intercession. Commentary
27 Hominem predicant, qui statim ut iactus nummus in cistam tinnierit evolare dicunt animam. 27. They preach man who say that so soon as the penny jingles into the money-box, the soul flies out [of purgatory]. Commentary
28 Certum est, nummo in cistam tinniente augeri questum et avariciam posse: suffragium autem ecclesie est in arbitrio dei solius. 28. It is certain that when the penny jingles into the money-box, gain and avarice can be increased, but the result of the intercession of the Church is in the power of God alone. Commentary
29 Quis scit, si omnes anime in purgatorio velint redimi, sicut de s. Severino et Paschali factum narratur. 29. Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory wish to be bought out of it, as in the legend of Sts. Severinus and Paschal. Commentary
30 Nullus securus est de veritate sue contritionis, multominus de consecutione plarie remissionis. 30. No one is sure that his own contrition is sincere; much less that he has attained full remission. Commentary
31 Quam rarus est vere penitens, tam rarus est vere indulgentias redimens, i.e. rarissimus. 31. Rare as is the man that is truly penitent, so rare is also the man who truly buys indulgences, i.e., such men are most rare. Commentary
32 Damnabuntur ineternum cum suis magistris, qui per literas veniarum securos sese credunt de sua salute. 32. They will be condemned eternally, together with their teachers, who believe themselves sure of their salvation because they have letters of pardon. Commentary
33 Cavendi sunt nimis, qui dicunt venias illas Pape donum esse illud dei inestimabile, quo reconciliatur homo deo. 33. Men must be on their guard against those who say that the pope’s pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to Him; Commentary
34 Gratie enim ille veniales tantum respiciunt penas satisfactionis ab homine constitutas. 34. For these “graces of pardon” concern only the penalties of sacramental satisfaction, and these are appointed by man. Commentary
35 Non christiana predicant, qui docent, quod redempturis animas vel confessoinalia non sit necessaria contritio. 35. They preach no Christian doctrine who teach that contrition is not necessary in those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessionalia. Commentary
36 Quilibet christianus vere compunctus habet remissionem plenariam a pena et culpa etiam sine literis veniarum sibi debitam. 36. Every truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without letters of pardon. Commentary
37 Quilibet verus christianus, sive vivus sive mortuus, habet participationem omnium bonorum Christi et Ecclesie etiam sine literis veniarum a deo sibi datum. 37. Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has part in all the blessings of Christ and the Church; and this is granted him by God, even without letters of pardon. Commentary
38 Remissio tamen et participatio Pape nullo modo est contemnende, quia (vt dixi) est declaratio remissionis divine. 38. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have said, the declaration of divine remission. Commentary
39 Difficillium est etiam doctissimis Theologis simul extollere veniarum largitatem et contritionis veritatem coram populo. 39. It is most difficult, even for the very keenest theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people the abundance of pardons and [the need of] true contrition. Commentary
40 Contritionis veritas penas querit et amat, Veniarum autem largitas relaxat et odisse facit, saltem occasione. 40. True contrition seeks and loves penalties, but liberal pardons only relax penalties and cause them to be hated, or at least, furnish an occasion [for hating them]. Commentary
41 Caute sunt venie apostolice predicande, ne polulus false intelligat eas preferri ceteris bonis operibus charitatis. 41. Apostolic pardons are to be preached with caution, lest the people may falsely think them preferable to other good works of love. Commentary
42 Docendi sunt christiani, quod Pape mens non est redemptionem veniarum ulla ex parte comparandam esse operibus misericordie. 42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend the buying of pardons to be compared in any way to works of mercy. Commentary
43 Docendi sunt christiani, quod dans pauperi aut mutuans egenti melius facit quam si venias redimeret. 43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better work than buying pardons; Commentary
44 Quia per opus charitatis crescit et fit homo melior, sed per venias non fit melior sed tantummode a pena liberior. 44. Because love grows by works of love, and man becomes better; but by pardons man does not grow better, only more free from penalty. Commentary
45 Docendi sunt christiani, quod, qui videt egenum et neglecto eo dat pro veniis, non indulgentias Pape sed indignattionem dei sibi vendicat. 45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a man in need, and passes him by, and gives [his money] for pardons, purchases not the indulgences of the pope, but the indignation of God. Commentary
46 Docendi sunt christiani, quod nisi superfluis abendent nessaria tenentur domui sue retinere et nequaquam propter venias effundere. 46. Christians are to be taught that unless they have more than they need, they are bound to keep back what is necessary for their own families, and by no means to squander it on pardons. Commentary
47 Docendi sunt christiani, quod redemptio veniarum est libera, non precepta. 47. Christians are to be taught that the buying of pardons is a matter of free will, and not of commandment. Commentary
48 Docendi sunt christiani, quod Papa sicut magis eget ita magis optat in veniis dandis pro se devotam orationem quam promptam pecuniam. 48. Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting pardons, needs, and therefore desires, their devout prayer for him more than the money they bring. Commentary
49 Docendi sunt christiani, quod venie Pape sunt utiles, si non in eas confidant, Sed nocentissime, si timorem dei per eas amittant. 49. Christians are to be taught that the pope’s pardons are useful, if they do not put their trust in them; but altogether harmful, if through them they lose their fear of God. Commentary
50 Docendi sunt christiani, quod, si Papa nosset exactiones venialium predicatorum, mallet Basilicam s. Petri in cineres ire quam edificari cute, carne et ossibus ovium suarum. 50. Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the pardon-preachers, he would rather that St. Peter’s church should go to ashes, than that it should be built up with the skin, flesh and bones of his sheep. Commentary
51 Docendi sunt christiani, quod Papa sicut debet ita vellet, etiam vendita (si opus sit) Basilica s. Petri, de suis penecuniis dare illis, a quorum plurimis quidam concionatores veniarum pecuniam eliciunt. 51. Christians are to be taught that it would be the pope’s wish, as it is his duty, to give of his own money to very many of those from whom certain hawkers of pardons cajole money, even though the church of St. Peter might have to be sold. Commentary
52 Vana est fiducia salutis per literas veniarum, etiam si Commissarius, immo Papa ipse suam animam pro illis impigneraret. 52. The assurance of salvation by letters of pardon is vain, even though the commissary, nay, even though the pope himself, were to stake his soul upon it. Commentary
53 Hostes Christi et Pape sunt ii, qui propter venias predicandas verbum dei in aliis ecclesiis penitus silere iubent. 53. They are enemies of Christ and of the pope, who bid the Word of God be altogether silent in some Churches, in order that pardons may be preached in others. Commentary
54 Iniuria fit verbo dei, dum in eodem sermone equale ver lonius tempus impenditur veniis quam illi. 54. Injury is done the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or a longer time is spent on pardons than on this Word. Commentary
55 Mens Pape necessario est, quod, si venie (quod minimum est) una campana, unis pompis et ceremoniis celebrantur, Euangelium (quod maximum est) centum campanis, centrum pompis, centrum ceremoniis predicetur. 55. It must be the intention of the pope that if pardons, which are a very small thing, are celebrated with one bell, with single processions and ceremonies, then the Gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies. Commentary
56 Thesauri ecclesie, unde Papa dat indulgentias, neque satis nominati sunt neque condniti apud populum Christi. 56. The “treasures of the Church,” out of which the pope. grants indulgences, are not sufficiently named or known among the people of Christ. Commentary
57 Temporales certe non esse patet, quod non tam facile eos profundunt, sed tentummodo colligunt multi concionatorum. 57. That they are not temporal treasures is certainly evident, for many of the vendors do not pour out such treasures so easily, but only gather them. Commentary
58 Nec sunt merita Christi et sanctorum, quia hec semper sine Papa operantur graniam hominus interioris et crusem, mortem infernumque exterioris. 58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the Saints, for even without the pope, these always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outward man. Commentary
59 Thesauros ecclesie s. Laurentius dixit esse pauperes ecclesie, sed locutus est usu vocabuli suo tempore. 59. St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church were the Church’s poor, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time. Commentary
60 Sine temeritate dicimus claves ecclesie (merito Christi donatas) esse thesaurum istum. 60. Without rashness we say that the keys of the Church, given by Christ’s merit, are that treasure; Commentary
61 Clarum est enim, quod ad remissionem penarum et casuum sola sufficit potestas Papa. 61. For it is clear that for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases, the power of the pope is of itself sufficient. Commentary
62 Verus thesaurus ecclesie est sacrosanctum euangelium glorie et gratie dei. 62. The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God. Commentary
63 Hic autem est merito odiosissimus, quia ex primis facit novissimos. 63. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last. Commentary
64 Thesaurus autem indulgentiarum merito est gratissimus, quia ex novissimis facit primos. 64. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first. Commentary
65 Igitur thesauri Euangelici rhetia sunt, quibus olim piscabantur viros divitiarum. 65. Therefore the treasures of the Gospel are nets with which they formerly were wont to fish for men of riches. Commentary
66 Thesauri indulgentiarum rhetia sunt, quibus nunc piscantur divitias virorum. 66. The treasures of the indulgences are nets with which they now fish for the riches of men. Commentary
67 Indulgentie, quas concionatores vociferantur maximas gratias, intelliguntur vere tales quod questum promovendum. 67. The indulgences which the preachers cry as the “greatest graces” are known to be truly such, in so far as they promote gain. Commentary
68 Sunt tatem re vera minime ad gratia dei et crucis pitatem comparate. 68. Yet they are in truth the very smallest graces compared with the grace of God and the piety of the Cross. Commentary
69 Tentur Episcopi et Curati veniarum apostolicarum Commissarios cum omni reverentia admittere. 69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of apostolic pardons, with all reverence. Commentary
70 Sed magis tenentur omnibus oculis intendere, omnibus auribus advertere, ne pro commissione Pape sua illi somnia predicent. 70. But still more are they bound to strain all their eyes and attend with all their ears, lest these men preach their own dreams instead of the commission of the pope. Commentary
71 Contra veniarum apostolicarum veritatem qui loquitur, sit ille anathema et maladictus. 71. He who speaks against the truth of apostolic pardons, let him be anathema and accursed! Commentary
72 Qui vero contra libidinem ec licentiam verborum Concionatoris veniarum curam agit, sit ille benedictus. 72. But he who guards against the lust and license of the pardon-preachers, let him be blessed! Commentary
73 Sicut Papa iuste fulminat eos, qui in fraudem negocii veniarum quacunque atre machinantur. 73. The pope justly thunders against those who, by any art, contrive the injury of the traffic in pardons. Commentary
74 Multomagis fulminare intendit eos, qui per veniarum pretextum in fraudem sancte charitatis et veritatis machinantur. 74. But much more does he intend to thunder against those who use the pretext of pardons to contrive the injury of holy love and truth. Commentary
75 Opinari venias papales tantas esse, ut solvere possint hominem, etiam si quis per impossible dei genitricem violasset, Est insanire. 75. To think the papal pardons so great that they could absolve a man even if he had committed an impossible sin and violated the Mother of God — this is madness. Commentary
76 Dicimus contra, quod venie papales nec minimum venialium peccatorum tollere possint quo ad culpam. 76. We say, on the contrary, that the papal pardons are not able to remove the very least of venial sins, so far as its guilt is concerned. Commentary
77 Quod dicitur, nec si s. Petrus modo Papa esset maiores gratias donare posset, est blasphemia in sanctum Petrum et Papum. 77. It is said that even St. Peter, if he were now Pope, could not bestow greater graces; this is blasphemy against St. Peter and against the pope. Commentary
78 Dicimus contra, quod etiam iste et quilibet papa maiores habet, scilicet Euangelium, virtutes, gratias curationum etc. ut 1. Co. xij. 78. We say, on the contrary, that even the present pope, and any pope at all, has greater graces at his disposal; to wit, the Gospel, powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written in I. Corinthians xii. Commentary
79 Dicere, Crucem armis papalibus insighiter erectam cruci Christi equivalere, blasphemia est. 79. To say that the cross, emblazoned with the papal arms, which is set up [by the preachers of indulgences], is of equal worth with the Cross of Christ, is blasphemy. Commentary
80 Rationem reddent Episcopi, Curati et Theologi, Qui tales sermones in populum licere sinunt. 80. The bishops, curates and theologians who allow such talk to be spread among the people, will have an account to render. Commentary
81 Facit hec licentiosa veniarum predicatio, ut nec reverentiam Pape facile sit etiam doctis viris redimere a calumniis aut certe argutis questionibus laicorum. 81. This unbridled preaching of pardons makes it no easy matter, even for learned men, to rescue the reverence due to the pope from slander, or even from the shrewd questionings of the laity. Commentary
82 Scilicet. Cur Papa non evacuat purgatorium propter sanctissiman charitatem et summam animarum necessitatem ut sausem omnium iustissimam, Si infinitas animas redimit propter pecuniam funestissimam ad structuram Basilice ut causam levissimam? 82. To wit: — “Why does not the pope empty purgatory, for the sake of holy love and of the dire need of the souls that are there, if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a Church? The former reasons would be most just; the latter is most trivial.” Commentary
83 Item. Cur permanent exequie et anniversaria defunctorum et non reddit aut recipi permittit beneficia pro illis instituta, cum iam sit iniura pro redemptis orare? 83. Again: — “Why are mortuary and anniversary masses for the dead continued, and why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded on their behalf, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?” Commentary
84 Item. Que illa nova pietas Dei et Pape, quod impio et inimico propter pecuniam concedunt animam piam et amisam dei redimere, Et tatem propter necssitatem ipsius met pie et dilecte anime non redimunt eam gratuita charitate? 84. Again: — “What is this new piety of God and the pope, that for money they allow a man who is impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God, and do not rather, because of that pious and beloved soul’s own need, free it for pure love’s sake?” Commentary
85 Item. Cur Canones penitentiales re ipsa et non usu iam diu in senet abrogati at mortui adhuc tatem pecuniis redimuntur per concessionem indulgentiarum tanquam vivacissimi? 85. Again: — “Why are the penitential canons long since in actual fact and through disuse abrogated and dead, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences, as though they were still alive and in force?” Commentary
86 Item. Cur Papa, cuius opes hodie sunt opulentissimis Crassis crassiores, non de suis pecuniis magis quam pauperum fidelium struit unam tantummodo Basilicam sancti Petri? 86. Again: — “Why does not the pope, whose wealth is to-day greater than the riches of the richest, build just this one church of St. Peter with his own money, rather than with the money of poor believers?” Commentary
87 Item. Quid remittit aut patricipat Papa iis, qui per contritionem perfectam ius habent plenarie remissionis et participationis? 87. Again: — “What is it that the pope remits, and what participation does he grant to those who, by perfect contrition, have a right to full remission and participation?” Commentary
88 Item. Quid adderetur ecclesie boni maioris, Si Papa, sicut semel facit, ita centries in die culibet fidelium has remissiones et participationes tribueret? 88. Again: — “What greater blessing could come to the Church than if the pope were to do a hundred times a day what he now does once, and bestow on every believer these remissions and participations?” Commentary
89 Ex quo Papa salutem querit animarum per venias magis quam pecunias, Cur suspendit literas et venias iam olim concessas, cum sint eque efficaces? 89. “Since the pope, by his pardons, seeks the salvation of souls rather than money, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons granted heretofore, since these have equal efficacy?” Commentary
90 Hec scrupulosissima laicorum argumenta sola potestate compescere nec reddita ratione diluere, Est ecclesiam et Papam hostibus ridendos exponere et infelices christianos facere. 90. To repress these arguments and scruples of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and to make Christians unhappy. Commentary
91 Si ergo venie secundum spiritum et mentem Pape predicarebtur, facile illa omnia solverentur, immo non esset. 91. If, therefore, pardons were preached according to the spirit and mind of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved; nay, they would not exist. Commentary
92 Valeant itaque omnes illi prophete, qui dicunt populo Chrsti ,Pax pax’, et non est pax. 92. Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “Peace, peace,” and there is no peace! Commentary
93 Bene agant omnes illi prophete, qui discunt populo Christi ,Crux crux’, et non est crux. 93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “Cross, cross,” and there is no cross! Commentary
94 Exhortandi sunt Christiani, ut caput suum Christum per penas, mortes infernosque sequi studeant, 94. Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths, and hell; Commentary
95 Ac sic magis per multas tribulationes intrare celum quam per securitatem pacis confidant. 95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven rather through many tribulations, than through the assurance of peace. Commentary